Building simulation
IDA ICE work turns building geometry, envelope assumptions and schedules into demand profiles that can feed system-level decisions.
Energy systems modelling
This track collects the strongest energy-system evidence: IDA ICE building simulation, HOMER Pro island microgrid modelling, SAM and spreadsheet techno-economics, LEAP scenario modelling, Python/PuLP dispatch optimisation, scikit-learn forecasting and distribution-grid studies. PyPSA-NL is retained as a transparent exploratory learning project, while the core track is carried by coursework and project work with clear inputs, tools, assumptions and decision outputs.
Evidence map
IDA ICE work turns building geometry, envelope assumptions and schedules into demand profiles that can feed system-level decisions.
HOMER Pro work compares renewable supply, storage, grid imports and economics for small energy systems with resilience constraints.
SAM and spreadsheet models compare CAPEX, OPEX, LCoE, payback and sensitivity across heating and solar alternatives.
LEAP work links demand growth, policy assumptions, technology build-out, cost and carbon outcomes in a national energy model.
Python/PuLP dispatch models formalise objective functions and constraints for heat-source allocation, storage and emissions trade-offs.
scikit-learn forecasting and distribution-grid studies connect demand prediction, EV/PV/storage assumptions and operational constraints.
Interactive model stack
Hylkysaari and residential heating projects show a complete chain: estimate building demand, compare renewable supply options, size storage or heat pumps, and translate results into payback and design recommendations.
The district heating project moves from base dispatch to storage, future demand, electricity-price coupling and emissions minimisation. It is the cleanest evidence that the modelling work is not only simulation, but decision optimisation.
The Germany analysis links demand projections, eleven generation technologies, policy constraints, merit order, carbon outcomes and social cost. The value is not a single forecast; it is a transparent scenario structure that can be challenged and revised.
The heating-demand project compares logistic regression, shallow neural networks and deep neural networks. The important conclusion is engineering judgement: the shallow network is preferred because it generalises better and trains much faster than the DNN for a tiny accuracy penalty.
The grid evidence is strongest as supporting systems work: CIGRE-style distribution analysis, N-1 checks, EV/PV/storage impacts and constrained-flow thinking. PyPSA-NL remains visible as an exploratory learning project, not as the primary proof line.
Evidence-page standard
Core route cards
Building demand, microgrid, waste heat and economics for Hylkysaari Island.
Solar thermal, PV, heat pump and district-heating comparison for a Stockholm housing cooperative.
District heating dispatch with cost, storage, electricity-price and emissions trade-offs.
Germany electricity demand, technology build-out, cost and CO2 scenario comparison.
Weather and calendar feature modelling for building heating demand prediction.
EV, PV, storage and N-1 impacts on distribution-grid operation.